Se curity is a complex concept that involves various actors within different contexts. In the realm of security studies, the term “securitising actors” holds particular significance. These actors play a pivotal role in identifying and addressing perceived threats by framing certain issues as matters of security. According to the Copenhagen School of security studies, securitising actors are those who declare something, termed a “referent object,” as existentially threatened. Referent objects, in this context, are entities perceived to be under threat and possessing a legitimate claim to survival. By framing an issue as a security concern, securitising actors seek to garner support for extraordinary measures or policies to address the perceived threat.
Understanding the dynamics of securitising actors is crucial in comprehending how security discourse and policies evolve within societies and international relations. These actors span a wide spectrum, ranging from government officials and military leaders to media personalities and activist groups. Their power lies in their ability to influence public opinion and policy agendas by framing certain issues as existential threats. This process often involves rhetorical strategies aimed at mobilising support and legitimising drastic measures in the name of security. By manipulating perceptions of threat and insecurity, securitising actors can shape public discourse and policy responses to various challenges, whether they are real or perceived.
In essence, securitising actors function as agenda-setters who have the capability to define what constitutes a security issue and prioritise certain concerns over others. Their actions have far-reaching implications for governance, civil liberties, and international relations. By exploiting fears and concerns about security, these actors exert influence over decision-making processes and shape the contours of security policies. As such, scrutinising the roles and motivations of securitising actors is essential for maintaining a critical perspective on security discourse and ensuring that policy responses are grounded in evidence and accountable to democratic principles.
(Response: Securitising actors are individuals or groups that frame certain issues as existential threats and legitimate objects of security concern. They wield significant influence in shaping public opinion and policy agendas by mobilising support for extraordinary measures in the name of security.)