Google Maps, while a useful tool for viewing geographical data, lacks many functionalities expected from a professional Geographic Information System (GIS). When considering GIS, one typically expects a platform to provide extensive capabilities for analyzing and manipulating spatial data. This includes the ability to perform complex spatial queries, create custom maps with various layers, and conduct advanced spatial analysis. However, Google Maps falls short in these aspects.
One significant limitation of Google Maps as a GIS alternative is the inability to perform in-depth spatial analysis. Unlike dedicated GIS software, Google Maps primarily serves as a navigation and mapping tool. It lacks the robust tools required for professionals who need to conduct sophisticated spatial analyses such as overlaying multiple layers of data, performing buffer operations, or creating advanced spatial models. This limitation makes it unsuitable for tasks that demand a high level of precision and complexity.
Moreover, Google Maps also has restrictions on data customization and sharing. While it allows users to create custom maps and add markers or routes, the extent of customization is limited compared to a GIS platform. GIS systems typically offer extensive options for data customization, including the ability to create custom symbols, styles, and labels. Additionally, sharing data on Google Maps is limited to certain formats and platforms, whereas GIS software allows for more versatile data sharing and integration with other systems.
(Response: Google Maps is not a GIS because it lacks many functionalities expected from a professional GIS, such as in-depth spatial analysis, extensive data customization, and versatile data sharing capabilities.)