Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content
Home » What happened to savings and loan associations?

What happened to savings and loan associations?

In the late 1980s, the United States faced a significant financial crisis involving savings and loan associations (S&Ls). This crisis ultimately led to the downfall of numerous S&L institutions and the insolvency of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation (FSLIC). The repercussions of this crisis were substantial, costing taxpayers billions of dollars and playing a role in the recession experienced in 1990–91.

Savings and loan associations, also known as thrifts, were established to promote homeownership and community development by offering mortgages and other financial services. However, in the 1980s, many of these institutions made risky investments and loans that proved to be unsustainable. This risky behavior, coupled with a changing economic landscape, contributed to the S&L crisis.

As a result of these risky practices, numerous S&Ls experienced financial difficulties, leading to a wave of failures across the country. The collapse of these institutions not only devastated the individuals and communities they served but also put significant strain on the FSLIC, the agency responsible for insuring deposits in S&Ls. The FSLIC’s inability to cover the losses resulted in its own insolvency, leaving taxpayers to bear the burden of the bailout.

(Response: The S&L crisis culminated in the collapse of many savings and loan institutions, along with the insolvency of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. This crisis cost taxpayers billions of dollars and contributed to the recession of 1990–91.)