Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Skip to content
Home » Why is the Viper unsafe?

Why is the Viper unsafe?

The safety concerns surrounding the Viper, particularly the original RT/10 roadster model, stem from its design and features, or lack thereof. Boasting a formidable 400 horsepower, the RT/10 lacked fundamental safety features such as airbags and ABS (anti-lock braking system). Additionally, it notably lacked exterior door handles, emphasizing its raw and minimalist design ethos. With these omissions, the vehicle left occupants vulnerable in the event of a collision or loss of control.

According to reports and anecdotal evidence, the safety record of the RT/10 was alarming. It’s rumored that a staggering 30 percent of these roadsters met unfortunate fates, succumbing to accidents, some of which occurred shortly after leaving the dealership. This high rate of incidents underscores the inherent risks associated with driving the Viper, especially considering the absence of modern safety advancements that have become standard in contemporary vehicles. While the Viper may have been celebrated for its raw power and uncompromising performance, its safety shortcomings were glaring and contributed to its reputation as a precarious driving machine.

In retrospect, the safety deficiencies of the original Viper RT/10 serve as a stark reminder of the advancements made in automotive safety over the years. While it may have been an exhilarating experience to commandeer such a powerful machine, the lack of crucial safety features undoubtedly compromised the well-being of its occupants. As automotive engineering progresses, these early oversights highlight the importance of prioritizing safety alongside performance in the design and manufacturing of vehicles.

(Response: The lack of fundamental safety features such as airbags, ABS, and exterior door handles, coupled with reports of a high accident rate, contribute to the perception of the Viper as unsafe.)